Tag: Data

  • Choosing Churches: Our prioritisation methods

    Choosing Churches: Our prioritisation methods

    I’ve had the pleasure of studying Scottish churches for 14 years now and my PhD involved exploring 49 buildings across the length and breadth of Scotland, but never before have I had to rank them or choose which ones are most ‘valuable’. One major part of the ReACH project has been to do just that. We needed to choose ten at-risk churches in Scotland as case studies, where we visit them for a full heritage survey and hold an open day to investigate their social value. Just 10 churches out of more than 400 – no small task!  

    A cheeky remix of an image of an unimpressed Virgin Mary, part of the Annunciation from a 15th-century Flemish Book of Hours, f.45v, MS 312, Centre for Research Collections, University of Edinburgh (CC).

    I have a tentacular spreadsheet listing all the churches in Scotland that have recently closed as places of worship or are at risk of closing in the coming years. Within those unglamorous, finance-coded cells, rows, and columns have been my attempts to distil the complex wonders of hundreds of individual buildings. For the last few months, I have painstakingly checked each one against various lists which already exist to mark out which buildings are nationally important, and which may be more locally cherished. Adding information, refining it, removing churches which have been stripped of historical character, cutting the lists down and down to work out which ones we should mark for in-depth studies. It’s been eye-wateringly laborious as I squint at my screen. It’s also been a chance for me to discover churches which weren’t previously on my radar and appreciate anew the brilliant diversity of church heritage in Scotland. 

    My method looked simple on paper: take the lists of closing churches and check them against various ways people have prioritised them before, then slowly whittle them down to a shortlist. My first port of call was obvious, the listings by Historic Environment Scotland. But several people cautioned me not to rely on them uncritically, so I cast my net further. I added other churches where, for one reason or another, the statutory listing alone didn’t really reflect their importance. In 2000, Aonghus MacKechnie and Richard Fawcett (two world experts in Scottish church architecture) wrote a report for Historic Scotland with long lists of churches ‘worthy of consideration for being taken into state care’, which was incredibly helpful. I searched through other sources, adding other churches which might have been overlooked.  What started as a spreadsheet quickly became a collaborative exercise. Emily, our Community Officer, added in churches which may not be architecturally significant, but which had amazing social history. DJ from Scotlands Churches Trust drew on his huge knowledge to single out lesser-known gems. We sent our data to our Action Group who recommended yet more for the list. Glass experts from Rainbow Glass Studio steered us on where we would find William Morris and Douglas Strachan designs, a member of the Pictish Art Society flagged churches with early medieval carved stones, and staff from the Community Ownership Support Service told us where need was most urgent. 

    ‘Maison Dieu’ 2000 report for Historic Scotland by Aonghus MacKechnie and Richard Fawcett

    Every church on the resulting long list is special. There’s Maxwell Mearns church in Renfrewshire, a 15th-century tower house converted into a church and adorned with a halo-like circular addition for worship built out of concrete and corrugated metal sheeting in the 1970s. Linton Kirk in the Borders, where the dreaded Linton worm (dragon) slayed by Sir William de Somerville crouches in the 12th-century tympanum, and the vivid colours of stained glass by Douglas Strachan spill over the interior. Wellington (or Kelvin West) church in Glasgow, where a breathing place garden, painted ceiling, and delicately wrought 1902 light fittings sit behind the muscular Greek Revival portico.  

    The 10 case studies we eventually chose are emphatically not a list of the ReACH team’s 10 best churches. Rather, they are a cross section of Scotland’s church heritage at a time of enormous change. We were mindful that our picks should represent a variety of geographical areas in Scotland, as well as a mixture of date ranges, where the churches sit in their immediate landscape, the social makeup of their local communities, and what stage a church is at in its transition to new uses. All of the churches we have chosen for our 10 case studies have fantastic heritage and social value, but they represent the rule, rather than being the exception to it. I could easily have chosen 50 or 100 brilliant churches! Over the coming months, we’ll be introducing each of our case study churches and sharing what makes them special.  

    Throughout this process, I was very aware that my research into each church could only ever be brief. There are simply too many remarkable buildings, and with a two-year project, time is always ticking – not only for ReACH, but for the many churches facing uncertain futures.  As one of her first tasks, our new Research Officer, Rachel Pickering, is revisiting the long list and researching them more carefully, adding their information to our database. I am really excited for our next case studies and only hope I can return at some point to the countless other churches I’ve ‘met’ through this process, to give them the attention that they deserve.  

    See our case study on Whitekirk here, and please check out our events page to get involved in our heritage recording and social value open days. 


    Written by Dr Lizzie Swarbrick, Research Manager for Research in Action on Church Heritage

  • Behind the scenes: building the ReACH database

    Behind the scenes: building the ReACH database

    As fieldwork progresses and the first pilot studies take shape, an equally important strand of the ReACH project is developing quietly in the background: bringing together a robust, accessible and future-proof evidence base for Scotland’s church buildings at risk of closure.

    Over the last few weeks, the ReACH team have been laying the foundations of the project database that will ultimately sit at the heart of this website. This work is less visible than a site visit or a public talk, but it is essential for our project aims. Good decisions about the future of church buildings depend on good information, and that starts with clear, consistent and shareable data.

    Defining what we record and why

    One of our first tasks has been to decide the structure of the dataset itself: the headings, categories and definitions that will underpin how we record churches across Scotland. These decisions matter. They shape what stories can be told, what comparisons can be made, and how easily users – from congregations and community groups to researchers and decision-makers – can find what they need.

    We have been refining and testing a structure that captures both tangible heritage (from architectural features to current condition) and social value (including community relationships, activities, memories and local significance). This brings together Scotland’s Churches Trust’s longstanding recording methodology with the emerging needs of the sector.

    Bringing existing knowledge into one place

    Alongside creating the framework, we’ve been mapping the sources of data, research and surveys that already exist. Scotland is fortunate to have decades of studies, inventories, architectural records, community projects and specialist research – but much of it is scattered, stored in different formats, or not widely known.

    Over the past few weeks, we have had generous and productive conversations with researchers, heritage professionals and volunteers who are keen to collaborate – many of whom are part of our Heritage Action Group. Many are now working alongside us to help identify, review and connect the datasets they hold. Their willingness to share knowledge has reaffirmed something we already suspected: there is a real appetite for a central hub that brings information together while still pointing back to the organisations that created it.

    This part of the project is still growing, but the momentum is strong. We are already collating material into the draft database, testing how best to integrate external sources, and exploring how we can signpost to partner resources in ways that are clear and meaningful.

    Building an accessible digital platform

    Ultimately, the value of all this work depends on accessibility. That’s why the ReACH website is being designed not just as a project homepage, but as a long-term digital resource. The database will feed into public-facing pages that allow users to explore Scotland’s church heritage through filters and linked stories.

    This will take shape gradually, but the foundations are now firmly underway. As we continue to refine the database, expand our partnerships and test the user experience, we’ll share more updates on progress and opportunities to get involved.

    For now, a huge thank-you to everyone who has already contributed expertise, datasets and enthusiasm – if you know of a dataset that could be linked, then please do get in touch! Together, we’re building something that can support the future of these buildings and the communities connected to them, for years to come.


    Update from ReACH Community Officer, Dr Emily Johnston

  • ReACH Autumn Update

    ReACH Autumn Update

    As we move further into the autumn months, the ReACH team has been continuing to build momentum across our research strands. As well as making progress on our data collection, the past few weeks have also offered valuable opportunities to connect with others working in church heritage across the UK.  

    Reflections from the V&A’s Great Expectations Conference 

    Earlier this month, Lizzie attended the V&A’s Great Expectations: Working with Historic Places of Worship conference in London, with Emily and Helen joining the event online. The day brought together a broad range of voices, from heritage professionals, people working within faith communities, and even some familiar public figures like Hugh Dennis and Rob Rinder, who all reflected on the challenges and opportunities facing historic churches today.  

    Much of the discussion echoed themes at the heart of ReACH, including the necessity to understand churches as not only architectural landmarks, but also as places which are layered with memory, meaning and community identity. Many of the speakers shared personal stories and lived experiences which have shaped their connections to these buildings, emphasising that communities lie central to conversations about their future.  

    It was encouraging to see an alignment with our project aims, and to situate Scotland’s challenges within this wider UK context.  

    Sharing ReACH at the Historic Religious Buildings Alliance 

    Following on from her attendance at the V&A event, Lizzie also recently spoke at the Historic Religious Buildings Alliance (HRBA), which introduced the project to a new audience of practitioners, researchers and heritage professionals. The session also generated valuable contacts and potential collaborators, which we look forward to developing as the project progresses.  

    Progress on Data Collection  

    Our data collection work continues steadily, and we are currently gathering and consolidating information from national heritage records, archival surveys and church inventories, specialist databases and existing reports (such as those generated by Scotland’s Churches Trust Church Recording Project) and academic research.  

    This process is helping us to map both the existing knowledge base, as well as the gaps that still need to be explored. This is a critical stage as we begin to shape the structure of our database, which will be publicly accessible and will bring together tangible and intangible heritage information in a single, open resource.  

    We have also begun engaging with organisations and individuals across the sector to explore data-sharing collaborations. Many people have undertaken excellent recording work in specific areas of church heritage and we aim to bring these efforts together, in order to strengthen the overall picture.  

    Preparing Our Next Pilot Study 

    Alongside this work, we are now organising our next pilot study, which will help us to refine our fieldwork approach and test elements of both the heritage recording methodology and our social value surveys. These pilot stages are an important part of ensuring our processes are robust, scalable and useful for the range of communities and buildings that we will be working with across Scotland.  

    photograph of clipboard with project logo in front of Old High Kirk

    Looking Ahead 

    In the months ahead, we will be continuing our fieldwork, expanding our data collection and developing the structure of the database. Updates will continue to be shared here on our website, as well as across our social media channels.  

    We’re also pleased to share that our first Heritage Action Group meeting will take place in January – date to be confirmed. This session will focus on early findings, opportunities for collaboration and ways that the group can help shape the development of the ReACH database and fieldwork priorities.  

    Full details and registration will be circulated shortly. 

    If you are working on Scotland’s church heritage and would like to connect with us – or if you have existing data that you’d be able to share – we would be delighted to hear from you! 

    Be sure to sign up to our Heritage Action Group Mailing List if your work touches upon church buildings, their contents, or their social and cultural value, and you’d like to be a part of our growing network.